Search our site.

Results will appear instantly.

Top results

  • No results!
View more

Top people

  • No results!
View more
News & Blog

Corporate & Commercial Newsletter – March 2014

Welcome to the second in a series of departmental newsletters from Davis Blank Furniss. Our focus this time is on our Corporate and Commercial team.

DeBrieF OPINION:

Sonio Singh – a Partner in our Corporate/Commercial department – discusses Shareholder Agreements…

I was recently approached by a client who is the majority shareholder/director of a company. She works alongside three other minority shareholder/directors, but it came to her attention that at least two of them had breached various terms of their service agreements and Shareholders’ Agreement. The Shareholders’ Agreement and related Articles of Association provided that if they leave employment in such circumstances then they will be classed as ‘bad leavers’ and the remaining shareholders could buy their shares at the par value of £1 per share.

This can be a common problem so below, I address the likely issues that arise when seeking to enforce these ‘bad leaver’ provisions…

‘Bad leaver’ provisions are a complex area legally and are notoriously difficult to enforce in practice. In many cases, they generate numerous claims and counterclaims between shareholder directors who have fallen out; sometimes leading to literally years of litigation. Often, in cases involving small companies, it’s preferable for the Shareholders’ Agreement to contain simple no fault/ fair value exit provisions instead.

The first question you have to ask is whether you have sufficient control of the board to dismiss the offending directors? The second is whether the dismissal is lawful under the relevant employment law? If the answers are ‘no’ then they will potentially have unfair and/or wrongful dismissal claims.

Unless your Shareholder Agreement successfully excludes the same, such claims may include the loss of the value of the shares triggered by the dismissal and subsequent par value buy out. In the related field of share options, it has recently been held that you can contractually exclude such share value losses from wrongful dismissal claims but not from unfair dismissal ones.

Also, if the dismissal wasn’t lawful, you will need to read the ‘bad leaver’ provisions carefully. It’s quite common for them not to trigger on an unlawful dismissal, so trying to enforce them only to find that hadn’t triggered could be a costly mistake.

Finally, ‘bad leaver provisions’ have been the subject of challenges on the grounds that they are penalty clauses and therefore unenforceable. They may be at risk as they are designed to deter a breach as opposed to being a reasonable pre-estimate of the loss should such breach occur.

One way of sidestepping this issue is if the ‘bad leaver’ provisions are simply triggered by an employee leaving irrespective of whether there is a breach of his or her employment contract. The principle behind the drafting of such provisions is that only those employees that are there for the “long haul” – or are employed at the time of exit – get to benefit from an increase in the value of their shareholding.

Another straightforward way of avoiding this problem is if ‘good leavers’ (who obtain market value on exit) are simply those who leave by way of death/incapacity or who are declared to be ‘good leavers’ at the discretion of the majority shareholder(s). However, this usually won’t be appropriate where the co-shareholders are founders/quasi-partners as opposed to employees who are ‘made up’ and hold a relatively small shareholding.

Drafting Shareholder Agreements/Articles of Association where ‘bad leaver’ provisions may be required continues to remain an extremely specialist area and detailed advice is required to avoid the traps detailed above. Ensuring that all minority shareholders have the opportunity to take independent legal advice is also prudent practice in avoiding these pitfalls.

To learn more about Sonio and his work, please visit:
http://www.dbf-law.co.uk/our-people/sonio-singh/

DeBrieF TEAM SPOTLIGHT:

Andrew Ryan, Partner…

What does your role at Davis Blank Furniss involve?
I am the Partner and Head of the Commercial Litigation Team. I am responsible for overseeing the work of the entire department.

What is the best thing about your job?
Finding creative ways to solve the problems our clients face. Also, no two days are the same as we deal with a wide variety of disputes for all kinds of clients.

What is the best case you have been involved in?
Acting for the sole opposition MP in a foreign country in relation to a whole range of disputes between him and the governing party. I was immensely impressed by his single-minded determination and endless optimism in the face of extremely difficult circumstances.

Name the person who has been the biggest influence on your career.
Andrew Irvine, a solicitor who “took me under his wing” and taught me how to litigate.

If you were not a lawyer, what would you be doing?
I would be a genetic engineer!

For more information on Andrew and his work, please visit:
http://www.dbf-law.co.uk/our-people/Andrew-Ryan/

DeBrieF OPINION:

Andy McNish – a Partner in our Corporate/Commercial team – discusses agency contracts…

Many businesses use self-employed sales agents to sell goods for them without realising their obligations to the agent should they wish to ‘let them go’. We’ve recently provided agency contracts for all of an electrical wholesaler’s sales agents.

Previously, there were no written contracts in place and so, apart from the specifics of the agent’s duties being rather vague, the agents would be entitled under the Commercial Agents’ Regulations (on termination of the agency by the client or by expiry of time) to a compensation payment equal to the value of the agency to a hypothetical buyer (with no upper limit). They would also be able to claim ongoing commission for any sales made after termination to which they can claim to have contributed.

Although most of the provisions of the Commercial Agents’ Regulations cannot be contracted out of, we were able to draft the agency contracts so that the indemnity payment option would be used on termination/expiry (being based on value added by the agent during his agency and capped at one year’s commission) and to exclude any liability to the agent for commission on orders after his departure.

For more information on Andy and his work, please visit:

http://www.dbf-law.co.uk/our-people/Andy-McNish/

DeBrieF NEWS:

New Trainee Welcomed to the Corporate/Commercial Department

March has been another busy month for the Corporate/Commercial Department which has included welcoming Edward Moss to the team.

Edward has been working as Martyn Gee’s assistant at our Glossop office for the past three years but his arrival in Manchester is the first rotation in his trainee contract. Trainees move departments every six months and the Corporate/Commercial department is the first seat in the process.

Edward holds a 2:1 in Law from Sheffield University and he also gained a distinction in his Legal Practice Course from the College of Law in Guildford.

He brings a keen legal mind to the office and also a healthy appetite for bacon sandwiches!

Share this article

This entry was posted in News, Newsletters. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>